From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20060 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 03:54:57 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 03:54:57 -0000 Received: from mail-pj1-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 23:52:32 -0400 2023 Received: by mail-pj1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-27d0e3d823fso2661996a91.1 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:52:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698119549; x=1698724349; darn=9front.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RD0F8JyPX4lThU61nMaSoqEPIk7WYKaD1g+FMvrDl/Q=; b=nXVSSuNGmHutmAlTKCH63V3nl94VXDrRlwp/qwzjUTuB+TseeRsHLa7WyyXT7nUK8G yaC35QDaGN5jBV14PUMG31rnAsKNz0E/vh/2+U1lBYVS8LWr8odQaAcYUtU6dHVCz7EV xKeuHOCZP3cjYTKg2DXiNRSDy5oz7jFaOcGqN29Rw2N0nllfzlNkjuteRSRZYv3e5Oi3 lrYWQcqbHm3BxCouq7hrbRJDDK6WtuPPn3TYFpLyZaIzFpq2M9Hqmcb0i0xtMjL9p646 ipfab/Xz7e2fkw8fKysMRUIzEY0lSyKZzAY0hN1IuUuxWdxuE5OP81teUl85ItY7aO7h CQAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698119549; x=1698724349; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RD0F8JyPX4lThU61nMaSoqEPIk7WYKaD1g+FMvrDl/Q=; b=IIh7xeHdPfwNAFvH5HU28e8ZltimDFAFNjo3HlDdVN5d9dZQDdXasJteM6bF+O8P+I 8CnonkJUOnvaaK7SclVyI9KcM9g9f8KXBOVwN6PPYP5lU6fl6vP0fA+AyW6thxmug6ms o0HajWDOU8YlAL7xsEDLKKwLIPUPyP22T8u7MkPM1vHf9bGoYqEo0E1zSskzv4JxXUL5 3g7TOmo8ZZtOyIqFGUklZdun496r3okacckEc8/oc2qJ/8XEs2zscX+u9mHOjUEOq5T0 WCP+rLTKBBPe8J09CncRr6oxE2Kv/JdG8inY03i40Rqqa+a3p1ra5RxRzN44LeNANXWs tEeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxD0GXoVtWOvPhWQ2NltqPd5+thO+c8yWwjpsNdn/2pbrDO1zD0 k3uVZocHCVNzIDnKZr/d/Hod2OT2xKsyNw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH28z1lxBnoLopOSFi2VSEdOne8ZR+wTzXBKBRjFC2vaLsLExsotGc5MUE8Bisxsk+iEgnZYg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:357:b0:27c:f315:8b14 with SMTP id 23-20020a17090a035700b0027cf3158b14mr7959146pjf.33.1698119549342; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::441? ([2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::441]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k20-20020a170902ba9400b001bf52834696sm6655697pls.207.2023.10.23.20.52.27 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:52:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Blue-Maned_Hawk X-Google-Original-From: Blue-Maned_Hawk Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 23:52:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: 9front@9front.org References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid> <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com> <553d4b18-df20-45d6-b8ce-b9bd4f6b4320@invalid.invalid> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: social HTML session rails-aware wrapper-based DOM interface Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 10/23/23 23:37, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:32:20PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote: >>> I seen't how that justifies of the problem itself caring, of which to >> which your statement in reference to was. > > You're an idiot, then. Rude. > If your machine is worth supporting, people will > care. This problem'sn't unique particularly to this machine. 'Tis of the lib. 'Tis general. > Sysinfo output is the easiest way to make that determination. > Once again, you're not qualified to identify which information is > relevant. > If of this so certain you're, explain why should also you be, no? >> If you, as an english speaker, can parse that sentence, it is a valid >> english sentence. Back on topic, that does not clarify. > > Plenty of valid English sentences are shit. Most of yours have been. > 'Tisn't but m'dialect, man. >> Ah, i see what you're trying to do there now. You're not going to succeed >> in it. > > I strongly recommend you return any stolen property as quickly as > possible. I plead the fifth.