From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 13401 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 01:25:38 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 01:25:38 -0000 Received: from mail-oi1-f174.google.com ([209.85.167.174]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 21:19:02 -0400 2023 Received: by mail-oi1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3b2e44c7941so2829094b6e.2 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:19:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698110340; x=1698715140; darn=9front.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8AdX/gqkuEKIBPkTTTyHrOwSu17acjLK9ARp+EQxRys=; b=Yqgv0rPCAbERWl2TvPvOFX2Pu0xtRFXN5N9ZYAXGZGBgXjVB0Wny9zVTLpcyMXeSKP jVmmfd3Ix0+S7c4SbHc+7KvW47wG2L1hqfY0IEtXnZn66Hd0VM+BDU5bkpSK2rutEENs xy1U29Q1pCKP0ViMYsq+x1WMYBTTuXl7UpffL/Bo97KYBGFlU8lsDfZNX6KvsEMEE+DR JJv4IXgb6uvme040XvC+U5Rze7aV6er6ovdCF85AEnn/mJC2x22npicgvBdB1ACsEQAf dcKp+YYC7qbDMbnUnNESild16qPUCeYCUP3WzTz5Qx1dcpywXgDJ+J93ElvZ1FsDOaW7 pO9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698110340; x=1698715140; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8AdX/gqkuEKIBPkTTTyHrOwSu17acjLK9ARp+EQxRys=; b=l+Cxxyp4WRiR51oSUcfelVhcXxWz4dMEwAWAxrXUYTyEGB/jHsfYW2tW34j89vNTjp eod9IorEZGRlGB4WCEwbeigiwxdfO7xIEDJfdW4niO6UIgvSujUMT58UYL6PzHcPogHL r02cseMMHtOwOlHe2Cwde4urEglOY0yXO/b4TIQ91Y9S2eKDQpliyjs7j6VsbjZpCgzD fLHcJlF63yecNNN5FVSoFy3oo8N+rRHHNkmdwL4lqMWiMv3IwODwCVZ69q5+vBfbshdy 9IeberpQHHJdxkaR6wMhUBRAQBVsMk0P6x+g15i3IMGsdCvJ8XBxJYClWedR+NRzv3FV 45ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxvq+wmhSdoiDcftoIAHmaA8nUDi7UnssqXs5W/69QWV7ASb0jL Q37JVP9BTaDdMmZsu4E4aeYByzheb5y/Xg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHn7aSC+T/6gsvwbmwMMhJNzndSHpmw+YEPLs5dN9DpDoLOKmGX3LiRG6I+Z29G7a0aIrBAAA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1ca:b0:3a8:43d5:878b with SMTP id x10-20020a05680801ca00b003a843d5878bmr11765526oic.2.1698110339688; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::441? ([2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::441]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d19-20020aa797b3000000b006889511ab14sm6695528pfq.37.2023.10.23.18.18.57 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:18:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Blue-Maned_Hawk X-Google-Original-From: Blue-Maned_Hawk Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 21:18:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: 9front@9front.org References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid> <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: encrypted abstract NoSQL general-purpose layer Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 10/23/23 21:07, Michael Misch wrote: > Another fun fact is that no one on this list is paid, really ever to do the service thing. just a bunch of folks helping out because they like 9front and have the skills. Pretty neat! And if you want help, the low-effort, “Should be obvious” schtick you’re pulling will get you exactly ignored, because no one is paid to put up with it. > >> On Oct 23, 2023, at 6:03 PM, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote: >> >> On 10/23/23 20:38, Kurt H Maier wrote: >>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 05:05:57PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote: >>>> Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86. >>> Good. >>> […]Why? I made no insistence that it “should be obvious”. Contrary to your claim of loweffortness, I _did_ make an effort, that being to include only the needed information.