From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 4380 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2021 10:17:09 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Apr 2021 10:17:09 -0000
Received: from mail-41104.protonmail.ch ([185.70.41.104]) by 1ess; Fri Apr  2 08:01:03 -0400 2021
Received: from mail-02.mail-europe.com (mail-02.mail-europe.com [51.89.119.103])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail-41104.protonmail.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBdSS6gNpz4wyRW
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri,  2 Apr 2021 11:42:00 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail-41104.protonmail.ch;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com header.b="pGlo2RjS"
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 11:41:37 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
	s=protonmail; t=1617363701;
	bh=OIyU+lKg2QYXVK9zGE4CkF7QV8Z+UI1y2Cm8WnWIl+A=;
	h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pGlo2RjS4sJA3w91IFsE7j0qjwFPkrZb3Fbe7NOdCrgqaziKkcFklYoc1QAL/WRdH
	 7MNgZvUr7kjAnp/3fn8yEE3YU/bh9QEGvdAoja2N+j8hCCnmeAtl0e+Gq8o/F9xnaL
	 tUoaJBWMM9EfPMUd8ll1uoavtVjxLQ4O0hs+by5w=
To: "9front@9front.org" <9front@9front.org>
From: kemal <kemali13@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <fepG2HF_59q2KFtp3lbYatXyVQv9YRL46tyS0H_ZSpuOQXTimttK2JdbTWNUgD4rfXJwq92m0iLHIgH7DiJifM72IUFr788ty7UK6ApeQug=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210402111231.GC38272@nsmpr.xyz>
References: <20210402111231.GC38272@nsmpr.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: hypervisor grid deep-learning enhancement 
Subject: Re: [9front] fqa: fix foundation link; remove rogue rails.jpg
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

> This is my third attempt at sending this letter. I was getting
> really angry at 9front for not accepting them, but turns out it was
> misconfiguration on my end all along. As such, in the meantime
> these patches were reduced from 3 to 2, and became a bit stale, but
> I hope they will still apply cleanly, since they are mere one-liners.
> (I am also not sure if these "bugs" are not actually "features" now)

are you sure that you don't have more misconfigurations in your setup?
this mail ended up in my spam folder.