From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0B022FEB
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Sun,  4 Aug 2024 22:02:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from srv1.howhill.co.uk ([85.95.36.12]) by 9front; Sun Aug  4 16:01:27 -0400 2024
Received: from [192.168.1.223] (Ellychnia-corrusca.howhill.co.uk [192.168.1.223])
	(Authenticated sender: willow)
	by srv1.howhill.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A38971AE726
	for <9front@9front.org>; Sun,  4 Aug 2024 21:01:25 +0100 (BST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 srv1.howhill.co.uk A38971AE726
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=howhill.com;
	s=default; t=1722801685;
	bh=5BQmT9frP1GlEoni2nf+Xb8xnvqf/J/rwwYABYdq5Ts=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=EhWgr0LKPIq0WVTEWFw3G5VxCwNrlN5cKkZFTD20LmQIi6MyNpMN6xq68HhJ0yV9L
	 zYc73DsVkq+239Z4wZ/QrU2oKQ/ZiPsECfW+qm5fufUIC4pA9rlomVMSmfOpzkF9TZ
	 5avf6BdSMZH8KlbInyEtzL9LrqhiiB8jj0RdL7JWUzJcZThJFJrMKlx/AXogK2gJQ/
	 tSamiGOfa4ILX4s34wKLdEKEB3CYpRhIzD43ByZpAUuo7hOfJ+3rPU8dXg71sbhO0l
	 YuQeOsKyjcYftTyhbM7oux1/C1DBpITjaGEOmI3v8qA8QkT5ToomvE4dgwRQ41y7Ca
	 plO7sL3d2Bddg==
Message-ID: <ff0b135c-6e46-47bd-a7c5-1fd48f3f0419@howhill.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 21:01:24 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <d7b9eadd-c2b5-444a-821b-c72991ef532f@howhill.com>
 <CABB-WO_V84+BcDref07CGrb8iqKJZpTW-YdYMhyvMVH2WQ3F-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHwi9bz8+5xineQkYRHdpWk8sawYN8D=pbCOBYxJst3FxZWUug@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
From: Willow Liquorice <willow@howhill.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHwi9bz8+5xineQkYRHdpWk8sawYN8D=pbCOBYxJst3FxZWUug@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.77 / 20.00];
	BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%];
	SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
	GENERIC_REPUTATION(-0.68)[-0.6771149945298];
	MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[];
	MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
	FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
	MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
	FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
	TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
	RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A38971AE726
X-Rspamd-Server: srv1.howhill.co.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: metadata engine hardware-based singleton optimizer 
Subject: Re: [9front] Thoughts on Wayland?
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Though I guess there's nothing stopping you putting the draw on the same=20
machine as the client program=E2=80=A6

On 04/08/2024 20:54, Eli Cohen wrote:
> always better to be a willow that bends than the strongest oak in a sto=
rm :)
>=20
> there's a common misconception that plan 9 is an OS for a computer. pla=
n=20
> 9 is an OS for a network. drawing fast locally is not a plan 9 concept.=
=20
> plan 9 is a 9P multiplexer. a wayland shim for linux/mac/bsd/etc that=20
> renders to draw somewhere else on the network would be good and=20
> appreciated and a relevant plan 9 concept and people are working on=20
> it... but for a fast local wayland implementation, that's what linux is=
,=20
> and linux can be and is a part of plan 9 which is an OS for a network
>=20
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2024, 12:46=E2=80=AFPM Stuart Morrow <morrow.stuart@gmai=
l.com=20
> <mailto:morrow.stuart@gmail.com>> wrote:
>=20
>     How do you share memory over rcpu?
>=20