From: "David Jemmi" <david.jemmi@pactenovation.fr>
To: "CAML Mailing list" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: About futur of OCAML
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 18:17:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000101bf1ca8$ebeb19c0$490ad227@aladin> (raw)
In the page http://caml.inria.fr/tutorials/objectdemo.html, at the end, we
can read :
"Modules and Objects can be seen as structures, but we do know yet how to
unify the two different programming styles".
What is the idea behind this unification ?
Thanks.
Baubillier Stephane (France)
baubillier@hotmail.com
reply other threads:[~1999-10-25 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000101bf1ca8$ebeb19c0$490ad227@aladin' \
--to=david.jemmi@pactenovation.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).