From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA31350; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:21:36 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA31346 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:21:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mailb.telia.com (mailb.telia.com [194.22.194.6]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g3IJLYb11494 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:21:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from gateway (h175n2fls34o849.telia.com [217.208.235.175]) by mailb.telia.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3IJLY922274; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:21:34 +0200 (CEST) From: "Mattias Waldau" To: "'Christophe TROESTLER'" , "'O'Caml Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Re: The invert Benchmark Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:21:12 +0200 Message-ID: <000901c1e70e$33efda80$0200a8c0@gateway> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 In-Reply-To: <20020418.210731.25933501.debian00@tiscalinet.be> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk The use splay-trees instead: val iter: (key -> 'a -> unit) -> 'a t -> unit (** [iter s f] applies [f] in increasing order to all elements of [s] *) /mattias > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr > [mailto:owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr] On Behalf Of > Christophe TROESTLER > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:08 PM > To: O'Caml Mailing List > Subject: [Caml-list] Re: The invert Benchmark > > > First of all, many thanks to all who replied -- I really > enjoy being on this list! > > On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Xavier Leroy wrote: > > > > Maybe not. Actually, using Map isn't such a bad idea in > this program, > > because maps are already sorted. > > Yes, but can we rely on that since the documentation says: > > The order in which the associated values are passed > is unspecified. > > Does it mean it can change any time in the future or is the > library basically going to stay that way? > > Best regards, > ChriS > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners