From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA24764 for caml-red; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:27:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA29641 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:26:50 +0100 (MET) Received: from dux.ru (ns.dux.ru [193.125.210.65]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id eBLLQm926402 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:26:49 +0100 (MET) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dux.ru (8.8.8/8.7.6/DUX) with UUCP id AAA06756 for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:26:44 +0300 (MSK) Received: (qmail 699 invoked by uid 509); 21 Dec 2000 21:23:58 -0000 From: Semenova Natalya Nickolaevna Organization: Sanct-Petersburg State University To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Is Caml a suitable tool for complicated mathematical methods. Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:39:37 +0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00122200235700.00634@snob.spb.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Hi, We are going to rewrite a large bundle of Fortran-3 (!!!) sources to some "better" language. Sources are the solution of the system of differential equations in partial derivatives by normal finite differencing methods. Two candidats are voted: Pascal and Ocaml. Is Caml convenient tool for such tasks? -- ---------------- Semyonova Natalya Nickolaevna ----------------