From: "David McClain" <dmcclain1@mindspring.com>
To: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Evaluation Order
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:27:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001401c0f154$ef935150$210148bf@dylan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010609175833.03bdda20@chasm.org>
> The specification that indicates temporal preference is
>
> let <first> in let <second> in ...
>
> Argument evaluation order and temporal preference are two orthogonal
concepts and should not be conflated. I support unspecified argument
evaluation order.
I agree with you, but you have proposed effectively doing nothing. There is
no safeguard to prevent someone bypassing this syntax by accident.
- DM
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-10 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-09 15:59 David McClain
2001-06-09 20:17 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-06-09 23:12 ` David McClain
2001-06-09 23:28 ` David McClain
2001-06-10 1:04 ` Dave Mason
2001-06-10 2:25 ` David McClain
2001-06-11 13:03 ` Dave Mason
2001-06-12 17:55 ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-13 16:54 ` Frederick Smith
2001-06-13 21:43 ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-10 1:06 ` Charles Martin
2001-06-10 2:27 ` David McClain [this message]
2001-06-10 11:18 ` Tore Lund
2001-06-10 13:11 ` Tore Lund
2001-06-10 14:31 ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-12 15:12 ` Pierre Weis
2001-06-10 10:40 ` Joerg Czeranski
2001-06-10 14:06 ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-11 12:59 ` Dave Mason
2001-06-12 17:34 ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-10 13:47 ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-10 16:47 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-06-10 17:27 ` Dave Mason
2001-06-12 16:10 ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-09 23:19 ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-10 2:44 David McClain
2001-06-10 2:48 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-06-10 5:51 ` David McClain
2001-06-10 17:59 Damien Doligez
2001-06-10 18:28 ` Dave Mason
2001-06-15 17:00 Manuel Fahndrich
2009-06-14 16:36 evaluation order Christophe Raffalli
2009-06-14 19:40 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2009-06-14 21:12 ` Christophe Raffalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001401c0f154$ef935150$210148bf@dylan' \
--to=dmcclain1@mindspring.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).