From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA22611; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:44:33 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA21732 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:44:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hal-5.inet.it (hal-5.inet.it [213.92.5.24]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f9AFiV103963 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:44:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from root@localhost) by hal-5.inet.it (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f9AFiQk171190 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:44:26 +0200 Received: from unknown(194.185.164.88) by hal-5.inet.it via I-SMTP id s-194.185.164.88-yWWdNl; Wed Oct 10 17:44:26 2001 From: "Stefano Lanzavecchia" To: Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:44:25 +0200 Message-ID: <001701c151a2$70d3b900$58a4b9c2@MADOKA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <15204.1002728341@saul.cis.upenn.edu> Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > No, I meant, anyone who writes comments before the thing that they > refer to *and* indented more than the thing that follows them. Right! I see now... Sorry for having added to the confusion. I agree your proposal would perfectly cover my style. Thanks for taking time to reply. -- WildHeart'2k1 - mailto:stf@apl.it Homepage: http://come.to/wildheart/ <<>> ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr