From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id BAA19399; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 01:43:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA19200 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 01:43:12 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from www.duonix.com ([210.113.163.221]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gBQ0h2H13969 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 01:43:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from hama ([192.168.0.254]) by www.duonix.com (8.12.5/8.11.6) with SMTP id gBQ0ld1W074347; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 09:47:39 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from shoh@duonix.com) X-Authentication-Warning: www.duonix.com: Host [192.168.0.254] claimed to be hama Message-ID: <002101c2ac78$543556f0$fe00a8c0@hama> From: "SooHyoung Oh" To: , "Dmitry Bely" References: <007201c2aa5f$c96faf30$fe00a8c0@hama> <4r939otb.fsf@mail.ru> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] lablgtk, lablgl, lablglut on win32/mingw Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 09:47:12 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Which native tool do you need for Unison? --- SooHyoung Oh http://www.taglib.co.kr/shoh.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dmitry Bely" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 4:53 AM Subject: Re: [Caml-list] lablgtk, lablgl, lablglut on win32/mingw > "SooHyoung Oh" writes: > > > If you want to use ocaml lablgtk, lablgl, lablglut bindings on win32/mingw, > > please visit http://www.taglib.co.kr/ocaml/win32.html. > > > > It includes > > - lablgtk on win32/mingw: with some screen shots > > Good work, thank you. But unfortunately only bytecode library can be build, > not native one (so I currently cannot build Unison with you > libraries). Also, please state in the docs that -fnative-struct compiler > flag should be replaced with -mms-bitfields for gcc 3. > > - Dmitry Bely > > > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners