From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA24665; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:47:09 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA24660 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:47:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA23688 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:24:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f2QDOBr06033 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:24:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fabien (pc5209c.esiee.fr [147.215.50.37]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F41FD15EE for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:24:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <002d01c0b5f8$3cc0f790$2532d793@fabien> From: "FabienFleutot" To: References: Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why People Aren't Using OCAML? (was Haskell) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:25:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > > My team found it easier to learn erlang, for example. However, people > > love the strong type checking, and the fact that if it compiles its > > likely to run correctly... The english translation of the horse book should > > help. > > Yes, how is that coming? I hope that ugly horse can get replaced by a > beautiful dromedary. Unfortunately it won't happen: Perl users have allready `copyrigthed' this animal... Anyway, I'd be pleased to know: Why a horse? ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr