From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4982BB9A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:14:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA7AE95e003141 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:14:09 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA02120 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:13:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp06.web.de (smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA7ADhls005346 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:13:43 +0100 Received: from [84.165.141.199] (helo=wiko) by smtp06.web.de with smtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317) id 1EZ40U-0004v2-00 for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:13:42 +0100 Message-ID: <004801c5e384$14fc1460$15b2a8c0@wiko> From: "Andreas Rossberg" To: References: <12244524.1131308542594.JavaMail.www@wwinf1630> <1131319755.8596.75.camel@rosella> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wikipedia Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:14:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Sender: AndreasRossberg@web.de X-Sender: AndreasRossberg@web.de X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 436F28F1.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 436F28D7.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; rossberg:01 caml-list:01 ...:98 sourceforge:01 andreas:01 andreas:01 misleading:03 missing:06 stuff:08 wrong:08 wrong:08 some:12 but:12 there:17 there:17 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 "skaller" : > > In fact there is a lot of misleading or missing stuff in Wikipoedia, > and there are also some excellent articles. Try > > [...] > Referential Transparency (totally wrong) That article could well be more accurate and complete, but I don't see at all how you arrive at judging it "totally wrong". - Andreas