From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA05614; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:49:41 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA05575 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:49:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail16.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.216]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g6BIndD22403 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:49:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 24444 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 18:49:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO harry) ([64.81.246.34]) (envelope-sender ) by mail16.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jul 2002 18:49:37 -0000 Message-ID: <006101c2290b$cc96a900$0200a8c0@harry> From: "Harry Chomsky" To: "Caml-list" References: <004f01c22900$661387d0$0200a8c0@harry> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Status of callback_exn bug Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:50:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Never mind -- I see that the problem has just been fixed! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Chomsky" To: "Caml-list" Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:28 AM Subject: [Caml-list] Status of callback_exn bug > With all the talk about an upcoming release of OCaml 3.05, I thought I > should ask once more if anybody knows about the status of the callback_exn > bug that was reported on April 12, 2002 in > > http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200204/msg00065.html > > The CVS shows that a change was made to byterun/interp.c on that date, which > appears to be intended to fix the problem, but for me the problem remains > even with this fix. Is it possible that version 3.05 will really fix the > problem? If there's still more tweaking to be done, is it possible that it > could get done in time to be included in the release? > > Thanks, > Harry > > > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners