From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id EAA13076; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 04:16:09 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA13144 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 04:16:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from psyche.kaba.or.jp (psyche.kaba.or.jp [202.249.19.1]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h552G4H24990 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 04:16:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.kaba.or.jp (cascade.kaba.or.jp [202.249.19.34]) by psyche.kaba.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153A722A54; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:16:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from WARP (dhcp01.kaba.or.jp [202.249.19.36]) by mail.kaba.or.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id F410549A6D; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:16:02 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <007801c32b08$3941eb60$2413f9ca@WARP> From: "Nicolas Cannasse" To: "Alexander V. Voinov" , "Alan Post" Cc: References: <20030604120011.GA12262@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> <20030604.171327.37652101.debian00@tiscali.be> <20030604202317.GF18515@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> <3EDE572C.2010707@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> <3EDE71B6.5020502@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: yet another benchmark: List.map vs tail recursive map Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:14:41 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam: no; 0.00; cannasse:01 warplayer:01 caml-list:01 extlib:01 sourceforge:01 tail-rec:01 ocaml:01 nicolas:01 benchmark:02 modules:02 recursive:03 library:03 tail:03 reasonably:04 probably:05 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > >Have you seen the List.map provided by the extlib guys? > > > >http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ocaml-lib/extlib-dev/extList .ml > > > > > Yes-yes, I do and probably will switch to it if it's reasonably stable. > (the site says no releases available yet :-) The library has not been released yet because mainly we need to add some documentation and we're planning to include more modules. But you can consider that 90% of the library (including the current List tail-rec operations) is stable. Actually I think it's quite difficult to write unstable code with OCaml :-). Nicolas Cannasse ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners