From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50FA77EE25 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:44:25 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al4CACdDilJKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABZgz+DSLxBgTIOAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiCJgEFI1YQCxoCJgICRxAGG4d5BAmwGpImF4Epjg0zB4JrNYERA5k/hHsVjnc X-IPAS-Result: Al4CACdDilJKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABZgz+DSLxBgTIOAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiCJgEFI1YQCxoCJgICRxAGG4d5BAmwGpImF4Epjg0zB4JrNYERA5k/hHsVjnc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,724,1378850400"; d="scan'208";a="43538180" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2013 17:44:24 +0100 Received: from [192.168.10.156] (110-19.193-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.193.19.110]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC6F21E6AC6; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:44:29 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: Matthieu Dubuget Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <0089E80360C346ED8B4D07A8BF1D293B@erratique.ch> In-Reply-To: <528A40EB.3050907@gmail.com> References: <528A3772.6070000@gmail.com> <528A3E7F.7020608@gmail.com> <528A40EB.3050907@gmail.com> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camomile question Le lundi, 18 novembre 2013 =C3=A0 17:31, Matthieu Dubuget a =C3=A9crit : > If you still need some more advanced unicode related functions, you'll > have to stay with camomile, and solve the problem of the needed > ressource files at run time. If you are only looking for Unicode normalization you can also use Uunf [1]= which embeds the needed data in the executable.=20=20 Best, Daniel [1] http://erratique.ch/software/uunf