From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id CAA26528; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:26:39 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA26830 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:26:37 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from www.duonix.com ([210.113.163.221]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g6G0QYn00311 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:26:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hama ([192.168.0.254]) by www.duonix.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g6G0Tot50755 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:29:51 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from shoh@duonix.com) Message-ID: <008b01c22c60$7361d870$fe00a8c0@hama> From: "SooHyoung Oh" To: "Caml-List" Subject: [Caml-list] Why toplevel SHOULD bytecode? Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:33:47 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, ocamlers! I found something strange in toplevel code. Why toplevel SHOULD be bytecode? Is it not EASY to build native code toplevel? If so, how can I make it? --- SooHyoung Oh tel: 02)583-8709, 042)861-8649 cell. phone: 011-453-4303 web: http://www.duonix.com ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners