From: "David Allsopp" <dra-news@metastack.com>
To: "'Brian Hurt'" <bhurt@janestcapital.com>,
"'Jon Harrop'" <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Announce: xsetxmap, unfunctorized, Sexp-lib awareversions of Set and Map
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:56:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <008b01c8a549$e6fa0600$017ca8c0@countertenor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480F38D7.4050503@janestcapital.com>
Brian Hurt wrote:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
>
> > Actually I would say that your style is more useful than the built-in
> > Set and Map modules because you don't have to jump through hoops
> > defining your own "Int" module with its own "int" type and its own
> > comparison function over ints every time you want a set of integers. I
> > would put the comparison function in the set itself though.
> >
> >
> >
> IMHO, the Int module should be in the standard library, and the Set and
> Map modules should have already instantiated sets and maps for the
> standard base types (int, float, string, char).
Agreed - then we could also have more sensibly located functions such as
Int.of_string (note that it's the same length as int_of_string!!) and remove
lots of random functions from Pervasives!
All that said, and especially as StdLib changes are reasonably rare, I find
having files IntSet.ml and IntSet.mli containing:
include Set.Make(struct type t = int let compare = Pervasives.compare end)
and
include Set.S with type elt = int
isn't too bad (except that you have to include IntSet.cmo/.cmx when
compiling, obviously)
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-23 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-21 9:39 Announce: xsetxmap, unfunctorized, Sexp-lib aware versions " Berke Durak
2008-04-21 10:59 ` [Caml-list] " Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
2008-04-21 11:19 ` Berke Durak
2008-04-23 12:35 ` Jon Harrop
2008-04-23 13:25 ` Brian Hurt
2008-04-23 13:56 ` David Allsopp [this message]
2008-04-23 14:22 ` [Caml-list] Announce: xsetxmap, unfunctorized, Sexp-lib awareversions " Berke Durak
2008-04-26 14:44 ` Alexandre Pilkiewicz
2008-04-23 13:41 ` [Caml-list] Announce: xsetxmap, unfunctorized, Sexp-lib aware versions " Berke Durak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='008b01c8a549$e6fa0600$017ca8c0@countertenor' \
--to=dra-news@metastack.com \
--cc=bhurt@janestcapital.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).