From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA23562; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:06:10 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA22715 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:06:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from regyva.canterbury.ac.nz (regyva.canterbury.ac.nz [132.181.2.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i7PF67uA023556 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:06:08 +0200 Received: from CONVERSION-A1.it.canterbury.ac.nz by it.canterbury.ac.nz (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30791) id <01LE3SIJUMZKDQTJXX@it.canterbury.ac.nz> for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 03:06:05 +1200 (NEW ZEALAND STANDARD TIME) Received: from Praxis (Praxis.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz [132.181.9.181]) by it.canterbury.ac.nz (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30791) with SMTP id <01LE3SIIN3FYDO0YID@it.canterbury.ac.nz> for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 03:06:04 +1200 (NEW ZEALAND STANDARD TIME) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 03:06:11 +1200 From: Jason Smith Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-id: <009401c48ab5$0f371bc0$b509b584@Praxis> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <200408250926.28629.jgoerzen@complete.org> <20040825143828.GA15785@annexia.org> <4d029f7e040825075515b7711c@mail.gmail.com> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 412CAADF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; jns:99 canterbury:99 caml-list:01 bytecodes:01 fsharp:01 model:01 ocaml:01 partial:03 compilation:04 guess:06 i'd:06 i'd:06 aspx:90 student:11 jason:86 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > I guess one can always mention F# in this context. > > http://research.microsoft.com/projects/ilx/fsharp.aspx Yes I was just going to bring that up. I'd be interested in knowing if they target the same ILX instruction set that F# does. If not, I'd like to find out there compilation model, e.g. how they deal with partial applications etc.. Jason. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners