From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDACBC91 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:54:52 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAANL0EUfC2fJan2dsb2JhbACORgEBAQEHBAYJIA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,274,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="3008431" Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.90]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2007 19:55:09 +0200 Received: from orion.metastack.com ([80.177.38.218]) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.67) id 1Ih7gC-000L5F-71 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:55:08 +0000 Received: from countertenor (cpc3-cmbg6-0-0-cust100.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [81.101.140.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by orion.metastack.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l9EHpHWK018176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:51:17 +0100 From: "David Allsopp" To: References: Subject: RE: [Caml-list] OCaml on Windows help Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:55:06 +0100 Organization: MetaStack Solutions Ltd. Message-ID: <00c501c80e8b$5b14ec40$017ca8c0@countertenor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcgOY7mx7j9dPr5BR3KUT1v41ncwTQAJr2Ag X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 In-Reply-To: X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 cygwin:01 mingw:01 cygwin:01 bytecode:01 masm:01 ocamlopt:01 msvc:01 msvc:01 caml-list:01 readme:03 compiled:04 comparison:05 installed:05 > I installed OCaml on Windows XP (the MSVC version, since I assume > that's faster than the Cygwin version?). MinGW/Cygwin is faster than MSVC port for bytecode. README.win32 contains a full comparison of the three Windows ports. I don't know whether anyone's benchmarked MASM vs Gas for performance of programs compiled with ocamlopt, however... David