From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC227EE25 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:36:35 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of jon@ffconsultancy.com) identity=pra; client-ip=212.159.14.20; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="jon@ffconsultancy.com"; x-sender="jon@ffconsultancy.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of jon@ffconsultancy.com) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.159.14.20; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="jon@ffconsultancy.com"; x-sender="jon@ffconsultancy.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@avasout08.plus.net) identity=helo; client-ip=212.159.14.20; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="jon@ffconsultancy.com"; x-sender="postmaster@avasout08.plus.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisCAJqvfFLUnw4UnGdsb2JhbABagz+DR6lKkgxKgS0WDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiUBAQUIAhlLFwEDAgkOAwQBAQMCCRoDAgIZIwkBCQgCBAESCwUCh10DEwmqOIhYA4l1gSmLZoJfBoJlgUUDjxyKIpQC X-IPAS-Result: AisCAJqvfFLUnw4UnGdsb2JhbABagz+DR6lKkgxKgS0WDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiUBAQUIAhlLFwEDAgkOAwQBAQMCCRoDAgIZIwkBCQgCBAESCwUCh10DEwmqOIhYA4l1gSmLZoJfBoJlgUUDjxyKIpQC X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,658,1378850400"; d="scan'208";a="34403495" Received: from avasout08.plus.net ([212.159.14.20]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2013 10:36:34 +0100 Received: from XPS ([87.113.147.175]) by avasout08 with smtp id mxcY1m0053nHPDT01xcZfn; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:36:34 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OdqhUHjY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=TICNVJQxr52ePB7IOjMYhw==:117 a=TICNVJQxr52ePB7IOjMYhw==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=dlN-Lro554sA:10 a=Xub9RBUEA-sA:10 a=Kvk-SOs2Z7YA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=r2vSxAw-AAAA:8 a=0zY9ZKiRTjIA:10 a=NEAV23lmAAAA:8 a=ZOzjf2MOAAAA:8 a=CjxXgO3LAAAA:8 a=S6G45oI8f8FobBpul2YA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-AUTH: jdh302:2500 Reply-To: From: "Jon Harrop" To: "'Peter Zotov'" , References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:36:33 -0000 Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Message-ID: <010801cedc66$0425bcc0$0c713640$@ffconsultancy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGgoxwJKhkD3bR9IPQyJdy8fT65mJp3hbEA Content-Language: en-gb Subject: RE: [Caml-list] LLVM OCaml bindings I just wanted to check: you're not breaking the existing bindings, right? -----Original Message----- From: caml-list-request@inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr] On Beh= alf Of Peter Zotov Sent: 05 November 2013 04:24 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] LLVM OCaml bindings Hello folks, I'm currently working on improving LLVM's OCaml bindings. There's been quite some progress so far[1]; the only major areas pending ar= e AOT code generation and MCJIT support. I would be very interested to hear how are you using these bindings, or sug= gestions for future development. In particular, I'd like to understand the = impact of breaking the API. [1]:=20 https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/commits/master/bindings/ocaml --=20 WBR, Peter Zotov. -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs