From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA05BC57 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 12:40:51 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjcFAJvF7EtKfVI0gGdsb2JhbACReYEUimgIFQEBFCQiriMBBY4GAQSFEA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,229,1272837600"; d="scan'208";a="62826888" Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 May 2010 12:40:51 +0200 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so1509066wwb.39 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 03:40:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:organization:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=IcDYSBr3dbCeI+Mex2HPnDH1PJgSFBf/C95ASo7o4Dk=; b=IRm1gHvZ+/ngbfl/ef7IwUKuu8jb0olzTnYmImRycoo4J+LM9KeW/CbkPhT1zMiLLu IGHpB83qnfy6/Eq1WHUO8+dT2v+PTnbxCbX2ckUSbWBqSi5ZWLCOg2YhyipgtF46AZQz ffv3tjalH39Ri0lyEohhTkCLZHE05fuhsLYvU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:organization:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; b=bKP8cm1UH9GKKZdjR3nRODL5ayZ19b/yjQtHz8FpprXVCZXGB69gtgagZEh12C6fsJ meYXlNnyGOpBqjtaziG7mhY4CBtaB3jrIiZs6ERsGNW9rEKdLZOJgbxGVAiTLnUhn/WL eOe/XLa0/Lon84hSwESMALRWXBSERvFvcLuBo= Received: by 10.216.171.85 with SMTP id q63mr453465wel.143.1273833651231; Fri, 14 May 2010 03:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WinEight (87.114.183.77.plusnet.thn-ag1.dyn.plus.net [87.114.183.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g17sm1065153wee.17.2010.05.14.03.40.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 May 2010 03:40:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Jon Harrop To: References: <951508.20587.qm@web58708.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <201005061233.07551.peng.zang@gmail.com> <07b101caf08b$3e5022c0$baf06840$@com> <088201caf1ce$b5060cb0$1f122610$@com> <20100512151137.26894ywcpv71ixvk@imp.ovh.net> In-Reply-To: <20100512151137.26894ywcpv71ixvk@imp.ovh.net> Subject: RE: [Caml-list] about OcamIL Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:40:45 +0100 Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Message-ID: <012601caf351$e9a362e0$bcea28a0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acrx1LN6QmsMdzJYR2qbFtuQvaMnFQBUfFKg Content-Language: en-gb X-Spam: no; 0.00; bigloo:01 cheers:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 slower:02 xavier:06 benchmarks:07 jvm:11 jvm:11 moreover:13 limiting:15 language:15 performance:20 well:23 least:24 Xavier Clerc wrote: > Limiting myself to the JVM... > Moreover, at least Scala and Bigloo deliver excellent performances. I have benchmarks where the JVM is well over 10x slower than .NET. So I do not regard any JVM-based language as "high performance". Cheers, Jon.