caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jon Harrop" <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: "'Stéphane Glondu'" <steph@glondu.net>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>, <caml@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Why NOT to compile OCaml via C
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:34:57 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <019501ccb72f$bfb1fac0$3f15f040$@ffconsultancy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE1BE59.4020804@glondu.net>

Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> C sure is not a good target language, but assembly is not either.
> The assembly backends of ocamlopt (and GHC... there is no support at all on
> some Debian ports) look like a maintenance burden that their authors obviously
> cannot cope with. I find the idea of making ocamlopt a GCC (or
> LLVM) frontend the most sensible and constructive one I've seen in these
> discussions.

Perhaps because OCaml already has an efficient cross-platform bytecode interpreter.

> However, one barrier is the licensing: QPL is incompatible with almost any
> license (even QT does no longer use it!). Has it ever been considered to switch
> the "public" license to e.g. GPLv3 (which looks constraining enough, and
> compatible with GCC)?

Don't forget the CAML Consortium are selling OCaml under less restrictive licences.

Cheers,
Jon.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-10 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-09  6:57 oleg
2011-12-09  7:52 ` Stéphane Glondu
2011-12-09  9:58   ` Gabriel Scherer
2011-12-09 10:06     ` [Caml-devel] " Jonathan Protzenko
2011-12-09 11:03     ` Mehdi Dogguy
2011-12-09 12:08     ` Benedikt Meurer
2011-12-09 12:37       ` Gabriel Scherer
2011-12-09 14:05         ` Benedikt Meurer
2011-12-09 14:30           ` Török Edwin
2011-12-09 14:51             ` Benedikt Meurer
2011-12-09 23:38             ` oliver
2011-12-09 21:22           ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-12-10  9:36             ` Benedikt Meurer
2011-12-10 11:34   ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2011-12-09 23:01 ` oliver
2011-12-09 23:18 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2011-12-10  0:20   ` Till Varoquaux
2011-12-10  7:35   ` oleg
2011-12-10 15:40   ` Basile Starynkevitch
2011-12-10 23:56     ` Peter Hawkins
2011-12-11  8:24       ` Basile Starynkevitch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='019501ccb72f$bfb1fac0$3f15f040$@ffconsultancy.com' \
    --to=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml@inria.fr \
    --cc=steph@glondu.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).