From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 543AD7FAE1
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:58:12 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  jon@ffconsultancy.com) identity=pra; client-ip=84.93.230.244;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="jon@ffconsultancy.com";
  x-sender="jon@ffconsultancy.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  jon@ffconsultancy.com) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=84.93.230.244;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="jon@ffconsultancy.com";
  x-sender="jon@ffconsultancy.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@avasout03.plus.net) identity=helo;
  client-ip=84.93.230.244;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="jon@ffconsultancy.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@avasout03.plus.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnEAAHV3k1RUXeb0nGdsb2JhbABbhzbJDgKBIRYBAQEBAREBAQEBAQYNCQkULoQNAQUIAhljAwIJGAICJgICGSMbAgQBHQWIILkrhlOPWgwggSGOWIJogUEFjgpMmWaEDoMyAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: AnEAAHV3k1RUXeb0nGdsb2JhbABbhzbJDgKBIRYBAQEBAREBAQEBAQYNCQkULoQNAQUIAhljAwIJGAICJgICGSMbAgQBHQWIILkrhlOPWgwggSGOWIJogUEFjgpMmWaEDoMyAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,604,1413237600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="114070689"
Received: from avasout03.plus.net ([84.93.230.244])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 19 Dec 2014 01:58:11 +0100
Received: from XPS ([213.162.118.65])
	by avasout03 with smtp
	id VCy81p0021QkhfZ01Cy9uN; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:58:10 +0000
X-CM-Score: 0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=W7O2VHmk c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=npoQGnjoXlZRf5WRtrkx/g==:117 a=npoQGnjoXlZRf5WRtrkx/g==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8
 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=r2vSxAw-AAAA:8 a=hZcy26ovnpZO_5IP7bgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
 a=Hz8uuoNigAQA:10 a=PJUs05J0jEgA:10 a=fKOTOSCuQEUA:10 a=y-cHoHQLMk4A:10
X-AUTH: jdh302:2500
Reply-To: <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
From: "Jon Harrop" <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: "'Raoul Duke'" <raould@gmail.com>,
	"'OCaml'" <caml-list@inria.fr>
References: <CAJ7XQb7DzUkH0TzB1rSkDpw5e_KdyXSqZLMnfYWa_y3X9mqsYQ@mail.gmail.com> <21456.19915.45180.915211@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <CAH+PdrAzgcsjjsMwMypzr+F53m9rWx5yFHP4650w3rmTUJw1mQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHvkLrP3jJ0dp+rb4aUAQ4T5qNKYAi0W0KeLe3JNjLHFimZYfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKziXDWdKWyR5LigJXVk=ahp9SO+JOrH0CdqR6_ndiKh9yuqXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHvkLrMPXQU-vC3b7xTpNcHd0OHZJB=c4xGFqNCHsGfe8QkOjw@mail.gmail.com> <20140728112431.GC26816@frosties> <CAJ7XQb4Q8FSEOrNB0-anYmMaSKZqw-8zOrLc64eRN2zck5vSKg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPFanBFw9PUua4GmU+RwwGczmtykA9Qvk1Knv8xdb_aUPGpLKA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ7XQb5yXavK=qF4B3Uqd4ot-_O5ww=b+o4gYStWK7kOcSJX+w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ7XQb5yXavK=qF4B3Uqd4ot-_O5ww=b+o4gYStWK7kOcSJX+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:58:14 -0000
Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Message-ID: <01d401d01b26$e065f5b0$a131e110$@ffconsultancy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-index: AQH3O+vGrlzVr26Akm57AYt4HKblPQEXSZlCAk607ZIChQUe/wLHEG8OAsZvUdADbAEJsgKhmaZVAq/PfLgCUVDY/ZuTm7Aw
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] concurrent gc?

Raoul Duke wrote:
> the gc seems to be what is killing me, at least on the low-end devices wh=
ich i assume have smaller cpu caches

Make sure the minor GC size fits into the L1 cache.

Cheers,
Jon.