From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F9EBB84 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:42:08 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvoCAI4YmUlRZ90wlGdsb2JhbACCRiuKHH+GVQEBAQEJCwgJEQO8H4QcBg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,216,1233529200"; d="scan'208,217";a="24155288" Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2009 16:42:08 +0100 Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090216154207.UXPJ4080.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:42:07 +0000 Received: from romulus.metastack.com ([81.102.132.77]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090216154207.OHKM19264.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@romulus.metastack.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:42:07 +0000 Received: from Tenor ([172.16.0.9]) (authenticated bits=0) by romulus.metastack.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1GFg38I020842 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:42:04 GMT From: "David Allsopp" To: "=?utf-8?Q?'R=C3=A9mi_Dewitte'?=" , "=?utf-8?Q?'Micha=C5=82_Maciejewski'?=" Cc: References: <2184b2340902160715y1f935b5ehc0e6195b3f75b66b@mail.gmail.com> <906164100902160728i49d9a8ffme547f92d7ffb04fd@mail.gmail.com> <2184b2340902160732k59e7d0f6hb9ca6936f9432167@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2184b2340902160732k59e7d0f6hb9ca6936f9432167@mail.gmail.com> Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Threads performance issue. Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:42:02 -0000 Organization: MetaStack Solutions Ltd. Message-ID: <033801c9904d$1d7f8df0$587ea9d0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0339_01C9904D.1D7F8DF0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: AcmQTCnNBvXbVO+mQhSvqapI52dr5wAANedA Content-Language: en-gb X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.102.132.74 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=e9N9ZB37MisA:10 a=_UqoMb0AtCsA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=PGsDhDIcAAAA:8 a=ZOzjf2MOAAAA:8 a=n06BfVqjAAAA:20 a=by-PAWhHYZRYbacYf9kA:9 a=51MjNCpnqviufjuak1gA:7 a=v_5j3b7heoNDcLVLwwqsS-gOwbkA:4 a=hpF-ijbX5cwA:10 a=N5dV5QUae2AA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=_Z0g-BmjKiwA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Y2VNeNrzAAAA:8 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=HQ31llbKAAAA:8 a=V2CQzMCpAAAA:8 a=zmUyX2TrW6Jr-llAjMoA:7 a=YAK_EbfktWtVHQ5OozRtrdJGPMkA:4 a=37WNUvjkh6kA:10 X-Spam: no; 0.00; michal:01 ocaml:01 beginner's:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 michal:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 2009:98 2009:98 28,:98 28,:98 threads:01 threads:01 beginners:01 X-Attachments: cset="utf-8" cset="utf-8" This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0339_01C9904D.1D7F8DF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Which OS (and port, if applicable) are you using? =20 From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr = [mailto:caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of R=C3=A9mi Dewitte Sent: 16 February 2009 15:33 To: Micha=C5=82 Maciejewski Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Threads performance issue. =20 =20 On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 16:28, Micha=C5=82 Maciejewski = wrote: Hi, 2009/2/16 R=C3=A9mi Dewitte : > I guess it might come from GC slowing down thinks here, doesn't it ? I don't think so. Why do you think it's GC? Bad guess :) ! Any hint why just linking makes things slow ? =20 > Can ocaml use multiple cores ? No and as far as I know it's because of GC. ;-) Ok that's a shame but I will live with :) regards Miichal _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0339_01C9904D.1D7F8DF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Which OS (and port, if applicable) are you using?

 =

From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of R=C3=A9mi = Dewitte
Sent: 16 February 2009 15:33
To: Micha=C5=82 Maciejewski
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Threads performance = issue.

 

 

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 16:28, Micha=C5=82 = Maciejewski <michal.m.pl@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

2009/2/16 R=C3=A9mi Dewitte <remi@gide.net>:

> I guess it might come from GC slowing down = thinks here, doesn't it ?

I don't think so. Why do you think it's = GC?

Bad guess :) !
Any hint why just linking makes things slow ?
 


> Can ocaml use multiple cores ?

No and as far as I know it's because of GC. = ;-)

Ok that's a shame but I will live with = :)


regards
Miichal

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-lis= t
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

 

------=_NextPart_000_0339_01C9904D.1D7F8DF0--