From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61BCF7F20B
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:34:27 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnIBAPfWGFFKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABEgzqDFLpeDgEBAQEBCAkLCRQngh8BAQQBI1YFCwsaAiYCAkcQBhuIBAYECK1okWMEgSOPVzJhA5wCE41p
X-IPAS-Result: AnIBAPfWGFFKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABEgzqDFLpeDgEBAQEBCAkLCRQngh8BAQQBI1YFCwsaAiYCAkcQBhuIBAYECK1okWMEgSOPVzJhA5wCE41p
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,641,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="2292194"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2013 12:34:04 +0100
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (7-233.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.233.7])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FF22096F8B;
	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:33:57 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Thomas Gazagnaire <thomas@ocamlpro.com>
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <0388897636364093A29775AA28F2740A@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <509A76BD-E8E1-41DF-8116-883B8F573E0E@ocamlpro.com>
References: <92AE69ABC13D49FDAEF8612487219BE7@erratique.ch>
 <509A76BD-E8E1-41DF-8116-883B8F573E0E@ocamlpro.com>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] opam http repo, archive downloading



Le lundi, 11 f=C3=A9vrier 2013 =C3=A0 10:17, Thomas Gazagnaire a =C3=A9crit=
 :

> OPAM servers work as proxy: when a client ask for a source archive, it fi=
rst serves the one stored locally and if not present, look at the one upstr=
eam. So if you don't want to cache the archives, clean-up $URLREPO/archives.

That's what I thought but there seems to be a bug in the mechanism. Reporte=
d here [1]

Daniel

P.S. I don't want to bother too much the caml-list with opam question. Time=
 for a list ?=20=20

[1] https://github.com/OCamlPro/opam/issues/452