From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE953BB84 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:36:42 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao4CAKK/j0lIDtyZkGdsb2JhbACTej8BAQEBCQkMBxEDrR2MewEDAQOEFwaCMYFt X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,405,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="22702994" Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2009 14:36:42 +0100 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so1022406fga.43 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:36:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=mhAmSEHkfyhV6+/KkgjClVwd8SX9yJArcsdz691e13Y=; b=wrdxAECQFQRqNH+vlFEgkT2eMvBktaN+g9E0McoHS4dwnsClY/zSuZ4R5zVHIYfjJn kwWx7jvuNODuL0VFV9RCek/YM2b9UP9cGLIXZMGtIt5FVv649ZD7wgBnU5VyhhEiLLag aKB2prB0u7OPW8fPXGWnYJVgUFC2vpG0XlukQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=wuuC4Ei+9jEcCs7PQbZzhlbdRf+dA4QTxaBD92gNuy4gIlCIze9rboy7I/weO3cD1j 9uQM6jEs5sjF6kMNSoLwCcXvJ7CZvVDxv3+IkJ//mOZadTns47yRV9GAFgUkN/WoJ3EK YatctktiFlQ9D6rgXrK88O5SwmEZDEY0cIwos= Received: by 10.86.95.8 with SMTP id s8mr243823fgb.79.1234186602214; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:36:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? (163-119.77-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.77.119.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm1018016fge.44.2009.02.09.05.36.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:36:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= Message-Id: <0520EBEC-B30C-4D83-9153-A72BC3C986BF@erratique.ch> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= To: OCaml List In-Reply-To: <49902E11.2010101@lri.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: ocamlbuild documentation (was Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:36:02 +0100 References: <1233936696.6216.65.camel@Blefuscu> <200902071458.45000.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <498FF839.6090901@lri.fr> <499018C2.9080007@lri.fr> <499026F9.3030708@lri.fr> <997E6911-3D37-4FAA-A958-757AD21A9F4D@erratique.ch> <49902E11.2010101@lri.fr> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Spam: no; 0.00; bunzli:01 buenzli:01 ocaml:01 wiki:01 coherence:01 caml-list:01 btw:03 daniel:04 daniel:04 manual:06 ecrit:06 missing:07 disagree:08 function:08 function:08 Le 9 f=E9vr. 09 =E0 14:22, Romain Bardou a =E9crit : > Well I would disagree and say that the bare minimum is here. This is =20= > why I stopped contributing to the wiki: I had nothing else =20 > interesting to add. So now I ask: what exactly is missing from this =20= > bare minimum? A text with paragraph, words and explanations, not scattered phrases =20 and paragraphs without coherence. You know a structured document. > In my opinion, questions such as "can I use the flag function inside =20= > the rule function" are definitely not part of the bare minimum. Not but maybe _when_ I'm supposed to call Plugin.flag is. > (btw, the answer is: the use of the flag function inside the rule =20 > function is not specified, thus not documented) What do you mean by "not specified", your beautiful "manual" doesn't =20 even tell me where/when I should call Plugin.flag. Best, Daniel