From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF73DBBAF for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:34:59 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIBABfC60xKfVK2kGdsb2JhbACUNDGBJIxYCBUBAQEBCQkMBxEDH6RIi3wBBY4QAQSFSw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,244,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="89209666" Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2010 22:34:59 +0100 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so3510108wye.27 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:34:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:organization:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=k6VUzPMEBRTIXWxWqYjz7aO2kAdINOhYMn7PHRHoKAU=; b=JFbkce1ar/nBQewxA7I6ip4zEcDyf7sVrfwxk/uBg8O5m4PJ5VcKhbKFUm4Hu2iWZn tMVJI7oWRRCy6c94TzBuec3BekrlwstP4zEjJ4j6lB96xhx3xPyxxO1jPPMjpn73uUM+ lrjDzmL+G1L0OiVWcykzo6n2D96nPsFZuJ0OE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:organization:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; b=oZ6Hw2thYsH5QMlUJh5NDca2ezsGZ3lHOc0a1XdtWdC9f2fRy04VmXotofn2/yDiTH q0B5JILnwVDlX/R2lmI3WA4PJrL+pCeiL1mLG6fj4iPWDtQ86l5V2B/CsfNqrC1wfCQ4 G16X2vAL6aotm3iu9yhTo6YbOTsKTkfqLIKWQ= Received: by 10.227.71.207 with SMTP id i15mr8318785wbj.60.1290548098339; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from WinEight ([87.113.160.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm4430836wbc.15.2010.11.23.13.34.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:34:57 -0800 (PST) From: Jon Harrop To: References: <1290434674.16005.354.camel@thinkpad> <20101123.113733.2059974256209184038.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umons.ac.be> <065e01cb8b26$29e36e60$7daa4b20$@com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:34:37 -0000 Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Message-ID: <068701cb8b56$3b965f70$b2c31e50$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcuLOVvQX69lpUr1Tk6vaZYfsGUBYgAHNEBA Content-Language: en-gb X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 haskell:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 bounces:98 beginners:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 writes:01 bin:01 caml:02 caml:02 archives:02 caml-bugs:02 Yes, an answer to a better question. > -----Original Message----- > From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list- > bounces@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Isaac Gouy > Sent: 23 November 2010 18:07 > To: caml-list@inria.fr > Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? > > Jon Harrop googlemail.com> writes: > > > Ketil Malde crafted > > a much better solution but noted: > > > > "This is considered cheating, since it is the easy and natural way > to do > > it." - > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Shootout/Knucleotide > > > Not even cheating - just an answer to a different question. > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs