From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D93BC57
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 12 May 2010 13:57:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiMCALwz6ktKfVK0mGdsb2JhbACSeYsmCBUBAQEBAQgJDAcRIqtJAQWOMQEEhRI
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,215,1272837600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="50540733"
Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 May 2010 13:57:25 +0200
Received: by wyb32 with SMTP id 32so1650613wyb.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 12 May 2010 04:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references
         :in-reply-to:subject:date:organization:message-id:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index
         :content-language;
        bh=m9cDWdTmZzu23o649sSjNjL6apHtOsWkFUBSN4V7lH0=;
        b=Y3H8FYJtJ/+awNNb1/zNKGReWk2XE2PORFhiaFhTBNIUw8RIRz/RxTkCgvbXJdfeQ1
         HYdsGTMQ9c30biRqwKg6hpgBrP67707B0K+np8GORuNuYEOOSQNFJaz2UK8xpkLQ9jdk
         Ds9c1jao00MJ2vdaiVhWO+ZV7vbpYdXNSwFuk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:organization:message-id
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer
         :thread-index:content-language;
        b=ZscP/nTMmlIUaFvvajjbf/VLErUQJ3IdbHJ/XwH1osbhpw+pxnFC/7tsh4JRWsE5uo
         FitTq4thlJBM0YN7FbBuZpu9KHtPXqly1NNIZjgcp7VfK5dvKW1mQuvuY/F+jB7L78P4
         ZS6Pla88YfpjsI9VC40Llck8Dch/uSCHgppfw=
Received: by 10.216.188.207 with SMTP id a57mr4492984wen.147.1273665444924;
        Wed, 12 May 2010 04:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WinEight (87.114.183.77.plusnet.thn-ag1.dyn.plus.net [87.114.183.77])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k13sm63403wed.23.2010.05.12.04.57.23
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 12 May 2010 04:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com>
To: <peng.zang@gmail.com>, <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
References: <w2t320e992a1005051158pcdb30e5w48409aa8b6e464e4@mail.gmail.com>	<07b101caf08b$3e5022c0$baf06840$@com>	<AANLkTik7gzvUrLntCLbL7gQow4RCzkXDPwCNiCHIE6Or@mail.gmail.com> <201005111239.30902.peng.zang@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201005111239.30902.peng.zang@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] about OcamIL
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 12:56:56 +0100
Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy
Message-ID: <088101caf1ca$39e49550$adadbff0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-index: AcrxKKYHy6g17GxBQqm/DnbXgJhKsgAoU/uQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Spam: no; 0.00; toplevel:01 ocaml:01 cheers:01 peng:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 native:03 mean:08 suppose:09 buggy:11 think:13 mode:13 but:14 performance:20 anyone:21 

Peng Zang wrote:
> It even has a native mode toplevel now that's
> suppose to be fast (anyone have any experience with this?).

You mean "ocamlnat"? The performance was great but it was buggy and I think
it never made it into mainline OCaml.

Cheers,
Jon.