From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18732BB84 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:10:32 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcEAC/LCknAXQIngWdsb2JhbACTUD4BARYirxmKPAEDAQODToIE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,523,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="18723058" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2008 17:10:31 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m9VGAVTc005353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:10:31 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjsBAHzKCklA6ba6imdsb2JhbACTUD4BAQEKCQwHDwWvGoo8AQMBA4NOggQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,523,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="19430640" Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2008 17:10:30 +0100 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so688256nfc.7 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer:sender; bh=oIQHQYBu/EGzk7ucu093EcJYoAwzXsLYDMynt4NjYgE=; b=d4xVzo3vmG+gwaB60Q9tarrbAeHMACRE5WiqgCFaeWxkl7ACGnV8N2StA+iIRmYnyU r1z5tyFyTfZoyZl2MuAV1UT7IVrJ/S/jY+vFI0M4Xzp1guY8vOS3c8ZQHZ2dggKFMEOT g7NNSkxSf9oHau2MypCvPQx+rSo6Qt/WEZ444= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer:sender; b=ZzXuSRdW+k4aXxFQPKGxuc4Jk8b0budeYYmu7Fkd65XmOd4vynQWe1xoYQoLTR/eR9 Sk8MNGwjedpo7/3YbQZEZimfB1bqXRvxVHsPA2NHj8wteYaYfFXk8i+CCyX3bNDv643W uGl2hlJpV9ppMRJeYzA0TKR4zRNQ+DkV1hAZc= Received: by 10.86.92.7 with SMTP id p7mr8423485fgb.24.1225469430567; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.2? (152-2.2-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.2.2.152]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm4300698fga.2.2008.10.31.09.10.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:10:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <090E5763-4835-4266-A8AD-7D9BA62154D5@erratique.ch> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= To: OCaml Mailing List In-Reply-To: <4d1b2df20810310843k79ef135fn5deaa9632272dd97@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] let rec and environment sharing Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:10:01 +0100 References: <4d1b2df20810301240o77e110cft6070c5cd0ad863b6@mail.gmail.com> <488D129D-0273-4DD0-AA2D-D39FC02594E6@erratique.ch> <4d1b2df20810310346j7824c379udceff0517c6eac94@mail.gmail.com> <265BA436-5079-47E2-862E-9A1CD15ECDCB@erratique.ch> <4d1b2df20810310843k79ef135fn5deaa9632272dd97@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Sender: =?UTF-8?B?RGFuaWVsIELDvG56bGk=?= X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 490B2DF7.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bunzli:01 buenzli:01 pointer:01 overwritten:01 rec:01 caml-list:01 closure:01 closure:01 let:03 daniel:04 daniel:04 i'd:06 ecrit:06 bla:08 environment:10 Le 31 oct. 08 =E0 16:43, Philippe Wang a =E9crit : > I believe the answer is no. Note that your example is not the same as mine, I do create a new =20 closure (the inner m1') which doesn't refer to bla in the code and the =20= pointer to the original m1 closure is overwritten. And I'd prefer a non empirical answer... Best, Daniel=