From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE59BB83 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:34:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.172]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6KIYTCg021218 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:34:30 +0200 Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k6KIYRpK000267; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (dsl092-032-215.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.32.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k6KIYPNa020049; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:34:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <304169FE-8DD8-4765-9AF1-A943C5293EEB@gmail.com> <5A0AA3B4-3ECE-43D5-BBFF-147867A585E1@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0C643017-44F3-44BC-A596-5BE2E0C11A95@mac.com> Cc: caml-list Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Snively Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Cocoa bindings (again) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:34:25 -0700 To: Joel Reymont X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44BFCCB5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bindings:01 bindings:01 o'caml:01 o'caml:01 haskell:01 ocaml-win:01 wwwfun:01 lablgtk:01 cocoa:98 20,:98 cocoa:98 stone:98 20,:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Jul 20, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Joel Reymont wrote: > I must be missing something but ... what does FRP have to do with > Cocoa bindings? > In and of itself, nothing; I just like the FRP approach to GUI programming, so I see an opportunity to kill two birds with one stone: 1) Provide O'Caml a nice FRP framework. 2) Provide O'Caml a nice GUI framework that doesn't suffer the vagaries of the usual OO GUI frameworks. Best regards, Paul > On Jul 20, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Paul Snively wrote: > >> 4) It's worth writing an FRP system for O'Caml a la Yampa for >> Haskell. >> 5) It's worth using said FRP system in conjunction with perhaps >> , http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto- >> u.ac.jp/soft/lsl/lablgtk.html, and our Cocoa bindings to create a >> truly cross-platform GUI environment for O'Caml. > > -- > http://wagerlabs.com/ > > > > >