caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@epfl.ch>
To: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Self-detection of native code execution (Was Re: [Caml-list] Accuracy of Gc.stat ())
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 15:20:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0C871798-1CF7-11D8-8FEF-000393DBC266@epfl.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031122114908.GA11593@redhat.com>


Le 22 nov. 03, à 12:49, Richard Jones a écrit :

>> Neat trick. This _ought_ to work, but it doesn't for some reason:
>>
>> 	let arg = (true, false)
>> 	external is_bytecode : bool * bool -> bool = "%field0" "%field1"
>>
>> 	let () =
>> 	  if is_bytecode arg then
>> 	    print_endline "Bytecode!"
>> 	  else
>> 	    print_endline "Native!"
>>
>> Perhaps someone can explain why ...

Nice try, too bad it doesn't work. I would even prefer that one :

let arg = true
external is_bytecode : bool ->  bool = "%identity" "%boolnot"

let () =
   if is_bytecode arg then
     print_endline "Bytecode!"
   else
     print_endline "Native!"


> OK, closer inspection of the manual[*] reveals why this doesn't work.
> Surely OCaml should flag the above code as a bug, because there are
> fewer than the magical 6 arguments?

The strange thing is that the function given by Kim also have fewer 
than 6 arguments.

Daniel

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-22 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-19 17:52 [Caml-list] Accuracy of Gc.stat () Daniel Bünzli
2003-11-21 16:46 ` Damien Doligez
2003-11-22  0:20 ` Kim Nguyen
2003-11-22 11:43   ` Richard Jones
2003-11-22 11:49     ` Richard Jones
2003-11-22 14:20       ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
2003-11-22 14:28         ` Self-detection of native code execution (Was Re: [Caml-list] Accuracy of Gc.stat ()) Richard Jones
2003-11-22 14:28       ` [Caml-list] Accuracy of Gc.stat () Kim Nguyen
2003-11-22 14:31         ` Richard Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0C871798-1CF7-11D8-8FEF-000393DBC266@epfl.ch \
    --to=daniel.buenzli@epfl.ch \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=rich@annexia.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).