From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D6DBC57
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed,  1 Dec 2010 13:59:20 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArQAAOvU9UxKfVK2kGdsb2JhbACVBYEkjGMIFQEBAQEJCQwHEQQeqXiLfAEFjgsBBIITgzQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,283,1288566000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="68925607"
Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2010 13:59:20 +0100
Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so22685119wyf.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:59:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references
         :in-reply-to:subject:date:organization:message-id:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index
         :content-language;
        bh=ldUakxQkboYC1W9VY9N+nuaufegydXzhKscY1Wo/bFI=;
        b=lk0nQIv8ZMML/RsgbSTSixYlIbYfRl1PB6/3XSv/03gWU2WKrKxvVQ/1ejFhFFEfQS
         GJgiKLdfLWlYi4YjRg7J+7gnTDchbi5E3HXB5JXYZhLP5ZJocdIT6t8cch52DEvZOsLB
         RAescfOBMachyva7AOvzjl9S0Tar69PVGbgRM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:organization:message-id
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer
         :thread-index:content-language;
        b=vlbRW6Tb84xv/zITerxb3/fVXhMT3yRtPRI6hnZ626cUB7IGXa4F+8UomP8mhsEOKP
         iRG3GwZ9EM/AeoHc3sjJYM1vo2L450d1hf5DX5bk5h/DQbYykSmYYz/8eMM9Be8IaYZS
         ij9aNIN3h1wYJHo4yvy8sx1v4+OoZTk5NwouY=
Received: by 10.216.24.132 with SMTP id x4mr1968372wex.81.1291208358238;
        Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:59:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from WinEight ([87.113.160.118])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o43sm3591835weq.47.2010.12.01.04.59.15
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:59:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com>
To: <caml-list@inria.fr>
References: <3DCEA910-1382-47E5-876B-059178F8F82E@googlemail.com>	<20101130124803.7952fca1@deb0>	<D6C274D9-8A00-4D6F-936A-58206CA5D358@googlemail.com>	<AANLkTi=Wu1SXVgQ+X0NECNx3oUsD=xEy-9Zq6T3ncJ+W@mail.gmail.com>	<B8C055A1-2A67-4C7E-BF67-4A639619C4EB@wanadoo.fr>	<0a8b01cb90da$da5e6240$8f1b26c0$@com> <20101201111600.1fca76d5.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101201111600.1fca76d5.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:58:52 -0000
Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy
Message-ID: <0b1e01cb9157$82389680$86a9c380$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcuQ7UY5eQxp+UR7SLOKe4ORqv+OcgAZ16+g
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 compiler:01 cheers:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 internals:03 erik:04 documented:10 programmers:13 U4:82 U4:82 well:23 why:24 another:24 

Erik wrote:
> Jon wrote:
> > LLVM is also much better documented than ocamlopt's internals.
> 
> LLVM has well over 20 full time programmers working on it. The
> Ocaml compiler has how many?

Another reason why LLVM deserves its hype.

Cheers,
Jon.