From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id FAA24077; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 05:43:18 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA24221 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 05:43:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from xanadu.ece.ucsb.edu (xanadu.ece.ucsb.edu [128.111.56.51]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h1L4hFT15889 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 05:43:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from cbshost-12-107-11-69.sbcox.net (cbshost-12-107-11-69.sbcox.net [12.107.11.69]) by xanadu.ece.ucsb.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h1L4hEPr020388 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:43:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] native threads not parallel? From: shivkumar chandrasekaran To: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: References: <847A10BA-4528-11D7-8C93-000393942C76@ece.ucsb.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 20 Feb 2003 20:43:14 -0800 Message-Id: <1045802595.1601.12.camel@cbshost-12-107-11-69.sbcox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Thanks, I was aware of that email. My question was really much more restrictive. I am only trying to run C-code in parallel. Of course the C-code (with no callbacks) is being called from caml. Please see Markus' message which my first email referred to. Thanks, --shiv-- On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 16:32, Chris Uzdavinis wrote: > Shivkumar Chandrasekaran writes: > > > Not sure if this issue from an earlier discussion was fully resolved > > or not. But I seem to have the same problem as discussed by Markus > > Mottl (see attachment below) on Mac OS X 10.2.4 on a dual processor > > G4 machine. An earlier message in that thread mentioned that there > > was no such problem on dual-processor Linux machines. > > > > I have two questions: > > > > 1. Has anybody else figured out how to get parallelism using native > > threads on Mac OS X? > > > > 2. Will I get the parallelism if I switch to LinuxPPC? > > Here's the best/most detailed answer to your question that I've seen: > http://makeashorterlink.com/?P28725B83 > > ...which expands to: > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=fa.dlqoshv.1a66ho7%40ifi.uio.no&output=gplain > > -- > Chris > -- Professor Shivkumar Chandrasekaran || phn: 805.893.7542 Electrical & Computer Engineering Department || fax: 805.893.3262 University of California || Office: 3109, Eng. I Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9560 || email: shiv@ece.ucsb.edu ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners