From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360397F75C
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:29:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjUCAEek/VNKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABbg2CCMYEiszaWCYcKPgGBJxABAQEBAQYNCQkUKYQEAQUjVhALGgImAgJHEAYbiDoECaptlEATBIEsjW0zB4J5NoEdBZIwgyyOGBiRQnCCSgEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: AjUCAEek/VNKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABbg2CCMYEiszaWCYcKPgGBJxABAQEBAQYNCQkUKYQEAQUjVhALGgImAgJHEAYbiDoECaptlEATBIEsjW0zB4J5NoEdBZIwgyyOGBiRQnCCSgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,409,1406584800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="91650414"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2014 11:29:33 +0200
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (188.29.165.81.threembb.co.uk [188.29.165.81])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AB222092D5;
	Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:27:38 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com>
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Message-ID: <104D94B9C9544BA1823C6F27B8CBF90D@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CAFrFfuH=a66jGPskNhJ4LeoRvgzRrQQP+zc8yM5GJOJk-A76-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFrFfuHqMWZYWmKCCLHgVO2wHctw4ULyMBOCn-Hu-63PuzX_tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFrFfuFrEcbCAovYXqBdrWL936roo_AQ7fBkwCkiq2jpNLfQzQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFrFfuH=a66jGPskNhJ4LeoRvgzRrQQP+zc8yM5GJOJk-A76-A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] is this an opam bug or something i'm doing wrong?

Le mercredi, 27 ao=C3=BBt 2014 =C3=A0 08:59, Martin DeMello a =C3=A9crit :
> sorry for the noise, looks like a bug with the package itself :( should'v=
e checked for that first
>=20=20
> https://github.com/OCamlPro/ocp-indent/issues/142
This should be fixed but your opam may be in a state where it's not easy to=
 apply the fix. Follow these instructions:=20=20

https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/commit/55042c39fcef4f8b1c4e5db7b11=
20180bab05921#commitcomment-7540530

Daniel