caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
To: Pierre Weis <pierre.weis@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Question
Date: 11 Dec 2003 02:53:51 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1071071631.4023.16.camel@pelican> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200312101027.LAA20728@pauillac.inria.fr>

On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 21:27, Pierre Weis wrote:
> [...]
> >  I was expecting "when" to be right distributive over "|". I find
> > OCaml's behaviour not very intuitive in such a situation.
> [...]
> 
> The when construct introduces a guard to a pattern matching
> clause. This means that a when construct is global to the entire
> pattern of the clause it appears in; it means in particular that no
> when construct can be nested into a pattern and the question of its
> distributivity wrt any other construct is pointless.
> 
> >  Is there a good reason for this?
> 
> Yes: simplicity, complexity invariants preservation for runtime
> pattern analysis decisions even in the presence of when clauses,
> easier understanding of the compiler warnings, simplicity and
> well-definedness semantics (in particular the desired invariance wrt
> the order of evaluation).

Whoa! Can you say that slower? Felix allows nested when clauses
in patterns (however it doesn't allow alternatives yet). 
The current implementation is unoptimised, 
I just evaluate the match of each pattern in turn until one matches.

One small difference .. the argument of a when clause is
an expression .. and felix expressions are purely functional
so there is no issue of order of evaluation changing anything.

So, what have I lost?


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-10 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-01 15:41 sebastien FURIC
2003-12-01 17:48 ` Remi Vanicat
2003-12-01 18:04   ` sebastien FURIC
2003-12-03 14:02 ` Damien Doligez
2003-12-10 10:27 ` Pierre Weis
2003-12-10 15:53   ` skaller [this message]
2003-12-11  9:52     ` Luc Maranget
2003-12-11 14:20       ` skaller
2003-12-11 16:56         ` Luc Maranget
2005-05-23  6:54 Question  dsingh01
2005-05-23  7:40 ` [Caml-list] Question Remi Vanicat
2005-05-23 12:21 ` Jacques Carette
2005-06-08 10:06 question  dsingh01
2005-06-08 15:13 ` [Caml-list] question Damien Bobillot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1071071631.4023.16.camel@pelican \
    --to=skaller@ozemail.com.au \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=pierre.weis@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).