From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA21416; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:59:26 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA20865 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:59:24 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail3.tpgi.com.au (mail.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.59]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i0LDxLP15056; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:59:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from 203-219-235-5-syd-ts26-2600.tpgi.com.au (203-219-235-5-syd-ts26-2600.tpgi.com.au [203.219.235.5]) by mail3.tpgi.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0LDxGk25607; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:59:16 +1100 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1 From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@tpg.com.au To: Maxence Guesdon Cc: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr, caml-list In-Reply-To: <20040120111253.3e81ee04.maxence.guesdon@inria.fr> References: <20040118174243.555a256e@haddock.max.fr> <1074561310.25914.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200401200437.30107.exa@kablonet.com.tr> <20040120111253.3e81ee04.maxence.guesdon@inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074693590.11497.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 22 Jan 2004 00:59:51 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 tpg:99 2004:99 maxence:01 guesdon:01 2004:99 granularity:01 interscript:01 fragment:01 tpg:99 glebe:01 2037,:01 9660:01 anyhow:01 tagged:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 21:12, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:37:30 +0200 > > I guess licensing is for people to worry about, not programs :) > > But providing an easy way to indicate the license is important, I think, > -> the @license tag I want to add. Some licences .. most licences unfortunately .. create problems for such fine granularity. Technically to 'element-get' a single element which is a 3 line function .. you'd have to include the whole licence blurb of 60 lines or whatever. In interscript (my literate progamming/packaging system), I created some mechanism in which a single copy of each required licence could be shipped with a package.. but the licences were never included in the actual sources. [The typeset output contained a link to the file for html, or a reference for latex, etc ..). Anyhow, when you 'element-get' an element, you probably have to ensure the element is (a) at least tagged in the fragment source with the licence name (b) a copy of the required notice is fetched as well .. even if the whole notice isn't included with each element. -- John Max Skaller, mailto:skaller@tpg.com.au snail:25/85c Wigram Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia. voice:61-2-9660-0850. Checkout Felix: http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners