From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA26454; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:22:44 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA26184 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:22:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail4.tpgi.com.au (mail.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.61]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i0LFMdv14009; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:22:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from 203-219-235-5-syd-ts26-2600.tpgi.com.au (203-219-235-5-syd-ts26-2600.tpgi.com.au [203.219.235.5]) by mail4.tpgi.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0LFMSis008561; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:22:29 +1100 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1 From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@tpg.com.au To: Sven Luther Cc: Maxence Guesdon , erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr, caml-list In-Reply-To: <20040121143535.GA6935@iliana> References: <20040118174243.555a256e@haddock.max.fr> <1074561310.25914.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200401200437.30107.exa@kablonet.com.tr> <20040120111253.3e81ee04.maxence.guesdon@inria.fr> <1074693590.11497.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040121151833.67a29f5c.maxence.guesdon@inria.fr> <20040121143535.GA6935@iliana> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074698584.11497.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 22 Jan 2004 02:23:04 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 tpg:99 2004:99 sven:01 luther:01 2004:99 maxence:01 guesdon:01 maxence:01 fragment:01 tpg:99 glebe:01 2037,:01 9660:01 nsw:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 01:35, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:18:33PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > Notice that many licences mandate that either the full licence or a > reduced version is available together with the source you distribute. I think that is easily solved as Maxence suggested. The problem is that some licences require that the licence or a reduced version of it *also* occur in every source file, and not just as a separate document in the distribution. I don't think the tool should try to solve that. I think that if this is the case the vendor simply can't put the elements into a repository without actually placing the whole licence in front of each fragment. -- John Max Skaller, mailto:skaller@tpg.com.au snail:25/85c Wigram Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia. voice:61-2-9660-0850. Checkout Felix: http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners