From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA21105; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:03:26 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA21154; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:03:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3984Hjq020216; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:04:18 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (ppp116-94.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net [150.101.116.94]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i39833vM023731; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 17:33:19 +0930 (CST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] failwith, raise and type inference From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net To: Xavier Leroy Cc: Christophe TROESTLER , skaller@users.sourceforge.net, caml-list In-Reply-To: <20040409093217.A6469@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <20040405225238.33087.qmail@web40613.mail.yahoo.com> <20040406.031524.77866470.debian00@tiscali.be> <1081235143.19232.22.camel@pelican> <20040409.091810.84299384.debian00@tiscali.be> <20040409093217.A6469@pauillac.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1081497782.20677.168.camel@pelican> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 09 Apr 2004 18:03:02 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 failwith:01 inference:01 sourceforge:01 2004:99 32,:01 intentional:01 precedences:01 expressing:01 precedences:01 9660:01 glebe:01 anyhow:01 nsw:01 snail:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 203 On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 17:32, Xavier Leroy wrote: > Off the top of my head, I'd say this behavior wasn't intentional and > is probably a mistake. I haven't checked with the Yacc grammar, though > (Yacc is somewhat cranky with the precedences, and it happens that > expressing the right precedences isn't obvious.) I tried and couldn't get it to work. Why use it anyhow? -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners