From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA16539; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:27:06 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA17404 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:27:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3OJR1YM009886 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:27:03 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (ppp119-113.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net [150.101.119.113]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i3OJQpZq017219; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:56:51 +0930 (CST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Should be INSIDE STANDARD-LIB: Hashtbl.keys From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net To: Nicolas Cannasse Cc: Richard Jones , caml-list In-Reply-To: <005501c429dd$5f478390$19b0e152@warp> References: <20040421011904.GA1411@first.in-berlin.de> <20040423145141.B3686@pauillac.inria.fr> <20040423150322.GA21489@redhat.com> <1082771932.21205.654.camel@pelican.wigram> <005501c429dd$5f478390$19b0e152@warp> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1082834810.9537.71.camel@pelican.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 25 Apr 2004 05:26:50 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 hashtbl:01 sourceforge:01 2004:99 cannasse:01 dynarray:01 extlib:01 extlib:01 dynarray:01 9660:01 glebe:01 nicolas:01 nsw:01 snail:02 lazy:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 19:20, Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > You can have a look at the nice DynArray module from the ExtLib : > http://ocaml-lib.sf.net I am (or at least was) one of the ExtLib developers.. I think the DynArray is good. I wish INRIA would take it. But I'm not happy with the lazy iteration, which is a central feature of that library. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners