From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA19209; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:35:07 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA19203 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:35:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3SFZ3jq030179 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:35:04 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (ppp119-113.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net [150.101.119.113]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i3SFYPk2018879; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:04:27 +0930 (CST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net To: Nicolas Cannasse Cc: "Yaron M. Minsky" , Brian Hurt , Martin Berger , The Caml Trade In-Reply-To: <01c201c42d29$63c88050$ef01a8c0@warp> References: <1083140676.9537.831.camel@pelican.wigram> <1083151902.29774.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1083154175.9537.944.camel@pelican.wigram> <010501c42d1d$86ed32d0$ef01a8c0@warp> <1083159592.9537.961.camel@pelican.wigram> <01c201c42d29$63c88050$ef01a8c0@warp> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1083166463.9537.1046.camel@pelican.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 29 Apr 2004 01:34:25 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 sourceforge:01 2004:99 cannasse:01 2004:99 cannasse:01 fitted:99 extlib:01 extensively:01 9660:01 glebe:01 arrays:01 equality:01 equality:01 nicolas:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 00:02, Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 22:36, Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > Such comparison tail = end , is also well fitted for the C++ world, where > in general NULL is the end of everything, and operator overloading helps > here a lot. Just one question : what is the excepted behavior of equality > between two iterators coming from two different data structures They have distinct types so: compile time error. [I assume you mean for example a list and an array] > What about equality between two > iterators over two different dynamic arrays ? I think from memory, equality must work. However, less (<) operator is undefined. > Please state clearly your problems on the ExtLib mailling list, I will be > happy to think about theses :) I already did quite extensively.. :) -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners