From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA17610; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:28:08 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA18173 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:28:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i77AS6mL019476 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:28:06 +0200 Received: from imp2-q.free.fr (imp2-q.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2F11C02D6; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:28:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by imp2-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 0EADFA5FE; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:28:06 +0200 (MEST) Received: from nas-p19-1-62-147-77-74.dial.proxad.net (nas-p19-1-62-147-77-74.dial.proxad.net [62.147.77.74]) by imp2-q.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:28:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1091874485.4114aeb5efd21@imp2-q.free.fr> Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:28:05 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?b?Suly9G1l?= Marant To: Michael Sperber Cc: caml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] XEmacs or GNU Emacs? References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.4 X-Originating-IP: 62.147.77.74 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4114AEB6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; jerome:01 marant:01 jmarant:01 caml-list:01 sperber:01 sperber:01 brandon:99 brandon:99 jerome:01 marant:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 writes:01 emacs:01 emacs:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Selon Michael Sperber : > >>>>> "Brandon" == Brandon J Van Every writes: > > Brandon> Does either XEmacs or GNU Emacs have any particular advantage to an > Brandon> OCaml developer on Windows 2000? I'm becoming aware that there's a > lot > Brandon> of politics about them, but hopefully people around here are > Brandon> disinterested and only concerned with what makes OCaml coding > easier. > > A slight advantage might be that the XEmacs package collection comes > with the O'Caml mode. Which is very outdated and unmaitained. -- Jérôme Marant ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners