From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA29330; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:53:57 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA30057 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:53:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7NLrrmL016202 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:53:54 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (ppp212-216.lns2.syd3.internode.on.net [203.122.212.216]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7NLriHY071471; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 07:23:45 +0930 (CST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Q: Correct locations for macro camlp4 extensions From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net To: David Brown Cc: Richard Jones , caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20040823203317.GA11880@old.davidb.org> References: <1093281685.412a2795efb43@webmail.fas.harvard.edu> <20040823182936.GA8152@annexia.org> <20040823203317.GA11880@old.davidb.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1093298024.15255.380.camel@pelican.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 24 Aug 2004 07:53:44 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 412A6771.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 camlp:01 sourceforge:01 2004:99 2004:99 haskell:01 haskell:01 9660:01 glebe:01 ocaml:01 nsw:01 snail:02 checkout:02 2037:03 similarly:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 06:33, David Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 07:29:36PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > > and similarly ((+) 3)? Or do these expressions do something more > > profound that I can't now recall? -- It's been a good 10 years since I > > did any serious Haskell. > > Haskell also allows (3 +), or more usefully (256 /) And ocaml is even more powerful, allowing you to curry ANY subset of arguments -- provided you label them. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners