From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA03784; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:09:22 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA01216 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:09:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i85J9JcE001699 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:09:20 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (ppp210-32.lns2.syd3.internode.on.net [203.122.210.32]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i85J9GHY042940; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 04:39:17 +0930 (CST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Announcing the OMake build system version 0.9.1 From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net To: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" Cc: "chris.danx" , caml-list In-Reply-To: <87fz5wu1of.fsf@qrnik.zagroda> References: <4139ECD3.1050708@cs.caltech.edu> <001e01c492a6$872c7280$19b0e152@warp> <413A0921.7030607@ntlworld.com> <413A1E89.10806@libertysurf.fr> <1094361655.3352.476.camel@pelican.wigram> <87hdqc3kfr.fsf@qrnik.zagroda> <413B279C.3020304@ntlworld.com> <874qmc221f.fsf@qrnik.zagroda> <1094400716.3352.699.camel@pelican.wigram> <87fz5wu1of.fsf@qrnik.zagroda> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1094411356.3352.877.camel@pelican.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 06 Sep 2004 05:09:16 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 413B645F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 sourceforge:01 2004:99 marcin:01 'qrczak':01 kowalczyk:01 sourceforge:01 dependencies:01 9660:01 glebe:01 ocaml:01 nsw:01 writes:01 checking:01 snail:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 02:21, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: > skaller writes: > > >> But how does it know it? How to specify that in a different way than > >> for make? > > > > I could suggest some, but first: you could use the same > > way as for make. > > How does it simplify my life if I have to write the same Makefile as > for make? By build rule I mean the thing in a makefile after the TAB character. > > However your dependency specification is treated like > > an optimisation. > > It can't be so, because parts of the information about which sources > to compile is encoded *only* in dependencies in a Makefile. You can just compile the lot. For Ocaml code I personally use a linear list with my own timestamp checking, and when i find a change everything in the list thereafter is built. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners