From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
Cc: warplayer@free.fr, caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why doesn't ocamlopt detect a missing ; after failwith statement?
Date: 26 Nov 2004 14:08:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1101438486.9291.138.camel@pelican.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041126.094412.30442729.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 11:44, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> But by definition 'a unifies with everything, including your void
> type, or you get a noncommutative notion of unification...
Can you give an example? I presume you mean that
the invariant U(t1,t2) == U(t2,t1) would break?
[I actually don't implement that constraint in Felix,
but it uses extensional polymorphism]
--
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850,
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-26 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-25 20:46 Richard Jones
2004-11-25 21:14 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Cannasse
2004-11-26 0:11 ` skaller
2004-11-26 0:44 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-11-26 3:08 ` skaller [this message]
2004-11-26 5:25 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-11-26 7:08 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2004-11-26 14:42 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-11-26 17:01 ` Alain Frisch
2004-11-26 19:36 ` Michal Moskal
2004-11-26 17:01 ` Damien Doligez
2004-11-29 0:40 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-11-29 11:07 ` [Caml-list] Why doesn't ocamlopt detect a missing ; afterfailwith statement? Frederic van der Plancke
2004-11-29 11:43 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-11-29 11:27 ` Frederic van der Plancke
2004-11-26 22:24 ` [Caml-list] Why doesn't ocamlopt detect a missing ; after failwith statement? Hendrik Tews
2004-11-27 3:47 ` skaller
2004-11-29 0:01 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-11-29 7:52 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2004-11-26 3:58 ` skaller
2004-11-26 19:16 ` Brian Hurt
2004-11-26 9:01 ` Richard Jones
2004-11-26 9:56 ` skaller
2004-11-26 13:32 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1101438486.9291.138.camel@pelican.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
--cc=warplayer@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).