From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C024BB81 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:10:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from will.iki.fi (will.iki.fi [217.169.64.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBE9A5jJ011987 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:10:05 +0100 Received: from ZMCXXXIII.dsl.saunalahti.fi (ZMCXXXIII.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.70.234]) by will.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D39B1A; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:10:03 +0200 (EET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Using OCaml in a kernel From: Ville-Pertti Keinonen To: Jonathan Roewen Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: References: <1102320552.663.45.camel@localhost> <20041211.080036.25909489.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:09:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1103015399.647.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 41BEADED.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 pervasives:01 libasmrun:01 libasmrun:01 byterun:01 functions:01 kernel:01 undefined:01 undefined:01 caml:02 caml:02 assembler:02 string:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 14:43 +1300, Jonathan Roewen wrote: > Three new undefined symbols left: > > : undefined reference to `caml_compare' > : undefined reference to `caml_greaterequal' > : undefined reference to `caml_lessequal' > > these are from pervasives.o, string.o, and list.o in libasmrun.a. If > can get some assembler niceties or whatever for those, then we should > hopefully be set for next phase of linker hell ;-) They should be in libasmrun. These particular functions should be coming from byterun/compare.c.