From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22539BB91 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 03:03:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBF23YrR010425 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 03:03:36 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (ppp209-112.lns2.syd3.internode.on.net [203.122.209.112]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iBF23S7D085553; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:33:29 +1030 (CST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Using OCaml in a kernel From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net To: Jonathan Roewen Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: References: <1102320552.663.45.camel@localhost> <20041211.080036.25909489.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <1103015399.647.7.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1103076208.2578.498.camel@pelican.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 15 Dec 2004 13:03:28 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 41BF9B77.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 libasmrun:01 ocaml's:01 stdlib:01 libs:01 glebe:01 061:98 unix:01 nsw:01 kernel:01 nums:01 closure:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 05:10, Jonathan Roewen wrote: > Turns out had to specify libasmrun on linker line twice. before and > after linking against ocaml's stdlib, str, and nums libs. Bizarre, but > it works. Unix linkers don't understand transitive closure.. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net