From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tuzi737@163.com>
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CCBBC88
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sat,  5 Feb 2005 10:20:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 163.com (smtp.163.com [202.108.44.212])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id j159K1lX025181
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:20:07 +0100
Received: from [192.168.2.183] (unknown [221.3.149.10])
	by smtp4 (Coremail) with SMTP id F8C1KKWPBEK6ks4B.1
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:19:36 +0800 (CST)
X-Originating-IP: [221.3.149.10]
Subject: Re:Estimating the size of the ocaml community
From: tuzi <tuzi737@163.com>
Reply-To: tuzi737@163.com
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:19:39 +0800
Message-Id: <1107595179.6605.25.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42048FC1.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 conflicts:01 -pack:01 lib:01 libs:01 163.:98 native:02 native:02 module:03 size:95 shared:04 style:94 mechanism:10 solve:10 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level: ***

Ocaml is good
But if it has 
1) easy mechanism  to solve module name conflicts
(do not tell me -pack option.  I do not want to touch other's lib)

2) native complier supports dynamic-linking ( at least ocaml style
native shared libs)
  
Ocaml will be perfect.

A perfect language is easy to be popular. 

Tuzi. P.