From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E89BB9C for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:17:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net (ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j8D7HqtK023044 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:17:54 +0200 Received: from rosella (ppp5-127.lns1.syd7.internode.on.net [59.167.5.127]) by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j8D7HYcT022158; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:47:35 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from skaller@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Compiling to OCaml bytecode From: skaller To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200509130754.39970.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <200509090622.58156.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <200509130148.01174.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <200509130754.39970.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PfcoJLE5vbzHrMSiPREG" Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:17:34 +1000 Message-Id: <1126595854.7216.55.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43267D20.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 bytecode:01 alas:01 grrr:01 mlton:01 ocaml:01 deprecated:01 bug:01 statically:01 cathedral:98 wrote:01 sourceforge:01 sourceforge:01 dynamically:01 X-Attachments: type="application/pgp-signature" name="signature.asc" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 --=-PfcoJLE5vbzHrMSiPREG Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 07:54 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > Yes, I'm just playing with it now. Absolutely fantastic to get native cod= e=20 > support! Alas, it has come just as we've moved to AMD64. Grrr. :-) Same problem with Neko, Demexp, MLton and a host of other products. One good thing about Ocaml! It has been made clear for some time AMD64 is a major target and i386 is deprecated: Cathedral got amd64 bit running early, and=20 with hardly any visible problems (I found just one small bug). Congrats! BTW: is dynamic loading support for native code any easier for x64_64? It would be really nice to build dynamically loadable native code function libraries with ocaml, not just statically linked programs. --=20 John Skaller --=-PfcoJLE5vbzHrMSiPREG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDJn0MsRp8/9aGVGsRAo86AJsEWknhPLkPd68EBXLeodUcVO1ToACfU2E9 hdl4F3hjMvmvDoHrocj6Eic= =ffNb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-PfcoJLE5vbzHrMSiPREG--