From: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
To: Vincenzo Ciancia <vincenzo_yahoo_addressguard-gmane@yahoo.it>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ray tracer language comparison
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 12:19:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1128853151.26806.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dialiv$j9v$1@sea.gmane.org>
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2005, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Vincenzo Ciancia:
> Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
>
> >
> > As you may have seen from my initial reply to that posting, I originally
> > was quite sceptical. However, I had a somewhat lengthy PM conversation
> > with Dr. Jon Harrop where he kindly and patiently explained to me his
> > methodology and findings, and eventually, this inspired me to contribute
> > another benchmark (which I did of my own) to this comparison.
>
> What is the difference, that you mention in your webpage, between "OCaml"
> and "Objective Caml"? It's not clear to me what your benchmark is about at
> all :)
I guess it's a joke. OCaml = the speed-optimized version; Objective Caml
= the version optimized for readability (which I don't agree with).
Gerd
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann * Viktoriastr. 45 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany
gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
Telefon: 06151/153855 Telefax: 06151/997714
------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-09 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-03 23:18 Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 13:49 ` [Caml-list] " Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 5:26 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 11:24 ` Yaron Minsky
2005-10-09 13:59 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 17:37 ` Florian Weimer
2005-10-09 18:07 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 14:53 ` Vincenzo Ciancia
2005-10-09 10:19 ` Gerd Stolpmann [this message]
2005-10-09 11:26 ` [Caml-list] " sejourne_kevin
2005-10-09 14:58 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-10-09 17:25 ` Thomas Fischbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1128853151.26806.66.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=vincenzo_yahoo_addressguard-gmane@yahoo.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).