From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EDBBB81 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:19:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j99AJD3J024217 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:19:14 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA01204 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:19:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.191]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j99AJClC014996 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:19:12 +0200 Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1EOYGu-0005xe-00; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 12:19:12 +0200 Received: from [84.58.130.196] (helo=gate.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1EOYGu-0007xK-00; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 12:19:12 +0200 Received: from flakew.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de (flakew.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de [192.168.0.32]) by gate.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5BBC074; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:19:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ray tracer language comparison From: Gerd Stolpmann To: Vincenzo Ciancia Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: References: <200510040018.24932.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 12:19:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1128853151.26806.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:a6865a839c0178d9aa0ce41878507ea2 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4348EEA1.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4348EEA0.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 gerd:01 stolpmann:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 gerd:01 stolpmann:01 viktoriastr:01 64293:01 darmstadt:01 wrote:01 caml:02 caml:02 telefon:02 objective:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2005, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Vincenzo Ciancia: > Thomas Fischbacher wrote: > > > > > As you may have seen from my initial reply to that posting, I originally > > was quite sceptical. However, I had a somewhat lengthy PM conversation > > with Dr. Jon Harrop where he kindly and patiently explained to me his > > methodology and findings, and eventually, this inspired me to contribute > > another benchmark (which I did of my own) to this comparison. > > What is the difference, that you mention in your webpage, between "OCaml" > and "Objective Caml"? It's not clear to me what your benchmark is about at > all :) I guess it's a joke. OCaml = the speed-optimized version; Objective Caml = the version optimized for readability (which I don't agree with). Gerd -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gerd Stolpmann * Viktoriastr. 45 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de Telefon: 06151/153855 Telefax: 06151/997714 ------------------------------------------------------------